Windows Safari

Posted Tuesday, June 12th, 2007 by James Rosenberg

Steve Jobs Presenting

Currently available as a Beta download, this move seems to make sense for Apple, who already have a 5% web browser market share, even though the previous version of Safari was Mac only compatible.

It also seems to make sense for users, who will now have more choice and flexibility over how they view the internet. Developers, on the other hand, will likely see this as yet another browser/operating system combination that, from initial tests, seems to be behaving unexpectedly on Windows already.

Although I welcome this move and think more choice is generally a good thing, I do think it is about time standards and consistency were enforced across all web browser implementations. This would save a great deal of developer time, enabling more time to be spent making better websites, plus it would also reduce cases of user frustration caused by browser misinterpretation.

About the author

James Rosenberg
James enjoys getting involved in projects and collaborating with clients to get the best results. He has carried out loads of user testing, using all sorts of materials to make them the best possible. He likes beer and playing golf (at the same time whenever that’s possible!). Email James, or call +44 (0)117 946 3930

Further reading

  • No Related Post

One Response to “Windows Safari”

  1. Giles Colborne

    Not sure this is a clever idea. Firstly, Apple probably shouldn’t be releasing beta software with such a splash. Expectations are always sky high with Apple and I don’t think the bugginess people are bound to experience will do them any good.

    Secondly, computer users tend to use what they’re given or what’s recommended by an expert friend. In Windows, IE is what you’re given and Firefox is beloved of techies because it’s so customisable and it’s open. Safari’s big benefits are its speed (hard to get across to people), its slick interface (not that much better than Firefox, though) and its standards compliance (unfortunately, not widely recognised because people design for the quirks of other browsers). So I wonder whether it will find a PC audience except among users who happen to have a Mac at home and like Safari.

    Not a revolution, then. At best, a slow burn.

Leave a reply