Usability and user experience
DJ and Bonny started a conversation off the back of The user experience of brands. It throws up the need to explore the difference between usability and user experience and in my opinion why they are both important.
As DJ mentions clients within the same vertical can suffer from the same usability issues. We fortunate to have worked with several companies within the same verticals and so have some thoughts around what the differences are.
My definition is this…
Actually let’s use the ISO definition for how usability can be measured as a starting point. ISO 9421 says that the usability of something should be measured in terms of it’s effectiveness, efficiency and satisfaction.
Effectiveness is about whether people can complete the tasks they’re trying to or not.
Efficiency is how quickly they can do it (tends to be less important in web and non-mission critical applications).
Satisfaction is a measure of how well people enjoy doing something (possibly the most interesting as a high user satisfaction has an effect on the users perception of effectiveness and efficiency).
So what’s user experience?
User experience is about the bigger relationship between the customer and a brand. So not so much whether something is usable or not, but how easy it is to understand, engage and have a dialogue with a brand.
That’s huge! It requires a need for everyone from board level to those on the shop floor (including designers, developers, copywriters and managers) to be thinking the same way and doing the same things.
You don’t need eyes you need vision
And that’s the crux of it. Without a singular vision of the user experience you want to create it’s very hard to achieve a great user experience.
Think of some great brands – Apple, Innocent Drinks, Nike, Howies (ok it’s getting personal now). Whoever you talk to within these brand shares the vision for who the company is and what it stands for.
What’s that got to do with my website / mobile app / newsletter / application?
Try thinking of these things as a colleague rather than an object.
As a colleague what would you want them to say about the brand, how would you want them to engage with your customers.
Certainly with websites they have in some respects become the voice of the brand. So how do they look, what do they say, how do they respond to complaints?
All these things are important in the realms of creating a great user experience. Making these things usable should be mandatory.
Thinking back to brands within the same verticals, it becomes easier to see how they can have the same desire to be usable while chasing after a different user experience.
Getting back to the vision
As a user experience consultancy cxpartners get to help people develop vision.
We haven’t set out only to make sites more usable and accessible, though these are important, we want our clients to understand how to talk and engage with their customers better.
How do we do this? We talk and engage with our clients customers and enable a conversation between them.
Talk to me
Do these ramblings make sense? I’d love to hear your thoughts.
About the author
Richard is a managing director at cxpartners. He works with brands to develop engaging user experiences for different devices, and loves creative problem solving. Richard does a lot of baking, and loves to make bread. Email Richard, or call +44 (0)117 946 3930
Subscribe to the RSS feed
Just to be challenging for a minute (because of course fundamentally I agree with you!)
I was recently in a pretty large room of online marketing & e-commerce professionals. They were being asked by the speaker (a very highly qualified usability / UX person from the States) to what extent they were doing user experience.
User testing? Quite a few hands went up.
Heard of Jakob Nielsen, read his articles? Still quite a few hands up.
Know what ‘heuristics’ are? A lot of hands went down…
Understand the process of designing for users, ISO standards, define user’s context and requirements, employ research techniques etc? I think it may have only been me with my hand up at this point…
Talking after the conference with some of the Stateside guys they said that this is not surprising at all, and that even in the US, there is still not much focus on even usability let alone user experience from the business and marketing side. Imagine if the topic were offline advertising, I doubt marketing types would admit to not knowing about some of the fundamentals required there.
It also quite rare in my experience, unless you’re dealing with a particularly structured and rigorous organisation, that there is a defined-and-signed-off, marketing-&-business-agreed “vision”. There are always slight differences and takes and agendas and spins to be had due to the nature of organisations, and the inevitable politics therein.
Both of these issues lead me to my point: in order to get beyond traditionally understood notions of “usability” (or to avoid it altogether!) and get into “user experience” you need:
- a huge amount of momentum behind the concept at the top level (or someone like Mr Jobs calling the shots…)
- savvy people to articulate and structure activities around the vision (usually people who have done this sort of stuff before)
- an amazing intuitive ability to prioritise, and fast
Perhaps this is too big a sell for a pretty large majority of clients?
Perhaps we should simply get them to watch some user testing? (First test comes free, then we’ll start consulting and helping you put things right…)
Just my 0.02ukp
Cheers
DJ